When I was 16 I figured out how to place stereo systems to generate a stereo image. Now at 53 I have met a few who had crazy amounts of $ in audio but only heard imaging in my systems. I could spend $200 at parts express on a system and it would image wonderfully after a easy set up. Its really not that hard or costly to generate a stereo image. And while I would say its important I could easily live with one large horn playing in mono. But to honestly answer this question about producing holographic images that are 3d visuals I dont have a holographic imaging set up conected to my audiosystems. Maybe in the future when such tech exists I will adopt it so at this time its not important in the future when it can render a 3d lynda carter it may become very important
How important is it for you to attain a holographic image?
I’m wondering how many A’goners consider a holographic image a must for them to enjoy their systems? Also, how many achieve this effect on a majority of recordings?
Is good soundstaging enough, or must a three dimensional image be attained in all cases. Indeed, is it possible to always achieve it?
Is good soundstaging enough, or must a three dimensional image be attained in all cases. Indeed, is it possible to always achieve it?
- ...
- 332 posts total
- 332 posts total