2. speakers
  3. 147797-2137

New Joseph Audio Pulsar Graphene 2

Just wanted to update my prior thread where this topic may have gotten lost.  As many of you may know by now, Joseph Audio has come out with the new Pulsar Graphene 2. This new iteration of the venerable Pulsars has a graphene coated magnesium midrange-woofer cone, and the drive motor, suspension system, etc., have been revamped. From what I have been told, the upgrade is pretty significant ... the sound is fuller and has greater ease, yet is very resolved. Jeff Joseph advises that an upgrade path will be available for existing owners of the Pulsars, too. Also, note that the price quoted in the Soundstage piece was in Canadian dollars ... Jeff informs me that the price in USD is $8,999 per pair. I am eager to hear the new Pulsars.
rlb61
prof
3,474 posts
 

Great, thanks for letting us know darren.
I get the feeling the new graphene models will have upped the popularity of the Joseph Pulsar/Perspective speakers.
I'm really intrigued by what JA at Stereophile will have to say about the new Perspectives in the July issue.  Apparently he's already written the review.
kenjit
1,771 posts
 
I'm really intrigued by what JA at Stereophile will have to say about the new Perspectives in the July issue.
5 stars obviously. I've never seen a bad stereophile review
prof
3,474 posts
 
 kenjit,

You can often find John Atkinson of Stereophile describing various deficiencies or oddities he's hearing in a speaker, whether he's reviewing it, or explaining his measurements. 


JA expressed clear reservations about the performance of the original Joseph Audio Perspectives - found them a bit too bright/unforgiving in the upper frequencies, and found the bass to be less defined than he'd like.

So I'm curious if he will find the new version sounds different in those parameters.




markalarsen's avatar
markalarsen
658 posts
 
I do not know if they were clear reservations or minor complaints. Stereophile rated them Class A with a lower bass restriction, higher than the comparable Focals. 
rlb61 OP
789 posts
 
As I recall, JA did have some reservations about the original Perspectives, but I think it had more to do with the components with which they were tested. The review of the original Pulsars was mostly unequivocal as compared to that of the original Perspectives, which I found to be more in line with the issue of component matching than anything endemic to either speaker. After all, both of them use/used the same tweeter and midrange/bass units. IIRC, Jeff’s "Manufacturer’s Comment" sidestepped JA’s criticisms of the Perspectives almost completely, most likely because there was nothing wrong with them inherently, and it made little sense to make a mountain over a molehill with respect to the use of complementary components.
More to discover