However, the upper shelf designers seem to make stuff that does not require cabels
Show me just one audio electronic manufacturer that doesn't use aftermarket cables to demo their gear.
I don't want to beat a dead horse but I'm bugged.
I just can't clear my head of this. I don't want to start a measurements vs listening war and I'd appreciate it if you guys don't, but I bought a Rogue Sphinx V3 as some of you may remember and have been enjoying it quite a bit. So, I head over to AVS and read Amir's review and he just rips it apart. But that's OK, measurements are measurements, that is not what bugs me. I learned in the early 70s that distortion numbers, etc, may not be that important to me. Then I read that he didn't even bother listening to the darn thing. That is what really bugs me. If something measures so poorly, wouldn't you want to correlate the measurements with what you hear? Do people still buy gear on measurements alone? I learned that can be a big mistake. I just don't get it, never have. Can anybody provide some insight to why some people are stuck on audio measurements? Help me package that so I can at least understand what they are thinking without dismissing them completely as a bunch of mislead sheep.
Well @atmasphere himself opined in the thread, and you quoted him.
I am in not position to refute what Ralph said, not Bruno, nor Nelson.
Have you heard any of the Purifi based Class-D? The Benchmark, or Atmasphere amps? I am seriously thinking about selling the VTLs, and the PrimaLuna. But I’ll slide a class-D in first to make sure. |
Ok - let’s take the Benchmark ABH2. On the back we find a pair of Neutrik SpeakOn connectors, like we find on many other pro audio pieces… amps and speakers. Many other amps also use those and they are common item for hooking up amps and speakers.
|
AVS tests measurements. It test well or it doesn’t - facts are facts. Good info but not the final decision for art or what a person likes. Some people like paintings that are hyper detailed (like a photo), some like impressionist paintings, which are a bit ’blurred’. I feel music is the same. Some like very detailed, some like a softer sound. Like any art form, the key is to make yourself happy. I think both are important when comparing equipment. For example, if you like a speakers particular 'sound' then you may want neutral DAC/AMP to not color the sound of the speaker you like. Likewise, if a speaker is a bit to crisp, then an amp with a bit of softness to it may be just what you need. Testing can help us get on the right path. |
I always hear this color issue from the measurement objectivists, they use the term accuracy as if it has no color. What proof do they have that accuracy has no color? Yes, measurements have correlations to qualities of sound reproduction, but our brains interpret these qualities in both common and unique ways. I've interpreted color from every single audio system I've ever heard, and that would range all the way from sterile to extremely romantic. Perhaps some believe accuracy lies somewhere outside this all encompassing bell curve. Please suggest to all us deluded audiophiles a single outlier system that is accurate and devoid of color, I really want to hear music reproduced with absolute accuracy. And then to prove that accuracy, it must conform to the original recording, we must be present at the time of that recording and/or the production/engineering of said recording. I'd say the objectivists have a tall task in front of them. |