However, readers and reviewers alike cannot really escape the issue of epistemology that confronts all of us as humans and as audiophiles. In plain english, we all face the issue of how we gather and transmit knowledge of the sound of audio equipment.
Hmm NO sir, THAT is YOUR, responsibility as an audiophile "journalist" As a Carpenter/Gen Contr., I built many houses. I designed and built my own house. I used measurements all day long over the construction period. After it was built, I put away the measuring tools and just enjoyed the house and lived in it. Yes, there are times I still use measurements in the house,such as hanging a shelf. The same can be said of the audio consumer who needs to find the proper sensitivity speaker for their low powered amp. But it ends there because every ear is different as is every room and every amp. Too many variables exist for the consumer and the builder alike. So the builders measurements are meant to build the best piece to perform under ideal conditions. This is why the piece of equipment sounds great in the showroom (which is ideal) but different at YOUR house.
The worst piece of equipment I ever bought sounded good in the showroom, had great specs and reviews but sounded like sh** with my original large advents (Luxman) I don’t usually talk bad about Luxman because I know that every persons hearing and preference, system and rooms are different. Many here like Lux for a reason...It worked for them. But I’m sure I am not alone in not caring for the Lux sound....at least their 80’s sound. I could carry on for much longer about this but the main point is that we are humans with all our differences because each of us are unique with unique likes and dislikes. We are NOT machines which are all stamped out from the same exact mold. For some reason, this seems to have been lost on the modern mindset. but that is another conversation.