Dear mjiostyn, I hate mathematics my whole life and ''it'' icludes
geomatry. So I have no idea what you are tolking about.
The damper, the tension wire and cantilever position
This question is for Dover. I would prefer our ''heighest authority'' Carr but
am reluctant to bather his with possible silly question. Dover however,
whom I regard as ''second authority'' , is used to answer also silli questions.
Now my assumption is that damper to which coills are ,say, pressed
by tension wire balance cantilever/stylu combo in ''all directions'';
left and right and above and below . BUT they also MUST FOLLOW
the GROOVES.
My observation however is that also ''deviant'' cantilevers which
nobody would buy look STRAIGHT IN DE GROOVE. Ergo:: it is
the groove which determine cantilevet/stylus position .?
Dear edgewear, From wrong assertio or premise one can not get triue conclusions. Your premise is that whole series Bleu is 40 Ohms while all are 5,2 ohms . For those Kondo san designed 2 SUT's , One of them is made from SILVER .Probable from 100 year old ITALIAN SILVER. This may be the reason for Alessandro's admiration. BTW for this one one should be looking . Than those 40 Ohm in between and your Lazuli as well my Black heart are again 5,2 Ohm . The nr 3 SUT is made for both 5.2 as well 40 Ohm but one need to switch between them with ALL intermediary wire, Not what one would call ''pure ' or conssequent solution . .
|
@nandric The askew Cantilever is present as a result of a change to parts that are designed to function in a particular way and are assembled to perform as a critical interface. The askew cantilevers Styli, when in the Groove may leave the impression the askew position has corrected. The likelihood is that the interfacing and critical function for the assembly of the parts as a optimised interface is now long passed and the present condition is best described as defunct. |
Dear nandric, I was indeed wrong about the Blue and Purpleheart, which were also low impedance designs. But in the case of the 'beauty' (Agate) my memory seems to be correct as several sources on the net confirm this was a 42 ohm impedance system. For the original Kiseki's there were two different motors, so it could still be the case that both Dynavector AND Kondo were involved in their design. At least it would explain the choice of SUT's for both low and high impedance systems. |
Dear pindac, I think that you have no understanding of damper function in connection with coil former. The coil is pressed against damper with tension wire. So tension wire ''center'' the cantilever. Those two srews on the generator are connected with tension wire, By pressing one or the other side the cantolever position can be changed. Aka ''corrected''. Otherwise their function would be incomprehensible, Today my son and I checked the Agaat with ''deviant cantlever'' iby playing records. The stylus is straith in the grooves, Ergo the grooves center the cantllever. The coill / damper combo follow the stylus in the groove. Those are very ''small'' presures . Try to move the stylus /cantilever with very smal pressure to see how ''elastic'' they are . In most cases 2 g VTF is used . This actully cqn;t be called ''weight''. |