Did Amir Change Your Mind About Anything?
It’s easy to make snide remarks like “yes- I do the opposite of what he says.” And in some respects I agree, but if you do that, this is just going to be taken down. So I’m asking a serious question. Has ASR actually changed your opinion on anything? For me, I would say 2 things. I am a conservatory-trained musician and I do trust my ears. But ASR has reminded me to double check my opinions on a piece of gear to make sure I’m not imagining improvements. Not to get into double blind testing, but just to keep in mind that the brain can be fooled and make doubly sure that I’m hearing what I think I’m hearing. The second is power conditioning. I went from an expensive box back to my wiremold and I really don’t think I can hear a difference. I think that now that I understand the engineering behind AC use in an audio component, I am not convinced that power conditioning affects the component output. I think.
So please resist the urge to pile on. I think this could be a worthwhile discussion if that’s possible anymore. I hope it is.
Hi @hilde45 I’d say @cleeds raised a serious question. What do you specifically find serious about Amir’s approach? I inquire with sincerity. Charles |
I could not care less for the opinions based on the measurements. Nor from anyone thats sticks their nose in the air toward anyone who doesn’t spend $5000-$20000 on cables. Whether something sounds good, to my ears, my brain, in my room at the volume I want, at a price I am comfortable with, is all that matters to me. “Golden ear” audiophools and sterile measurements crowd both be damned. |
When I first heard some folks quote his site. I dug deep into reading review after review and was horrified at his approach and conclusions. Not for me, it is simple to see all the flaws. But for newcomers to the pursuit.
I think in the beginning most folks new to audio will start by looking at specs and think this is the way to evaluate sound quality (once they moved out of features and function counting as an evaluation tool). This could turn off so many folks new to audio by influencing them to buy dry, dead, terrible sounding equipment and never experiencing real high end. It is a real shame. |
Without the internet, we wouldn't be talking about him. He and his audience are a product of our times and I'm old school enough to recognize a Johnny Come Lately with an agenda. He's really no different than an audio reviewer who sized up the playing field and saw an unoccupied space to settle down in. Heck, everyone's got to make a living. What upsets some is that he has his own belief system that contradicts most of ours. That's not a knock but just calling it like I see it. He's just one of many opinions and like elbows, we all have them. How much credence you give him and let it affect you, is on you. All the best, |
Measurements of gear versus listening the gear... We need the two.... The problem is Amir school and the subjectivist audiophile insist the two of them on the gear "magical qualities"; by virtue of their optimal standards measurement with Amir who swear only by that, and by virtue of the listening personal subjective experience with the Subjectivist who swear only by that ... What is the common factor between the two factions at war to define "good sound quality" : it is the the gear design and branded name , measured and verified and officially stamped by pope Amir or promoted, as listened to, by subjective audiophile reviewers...
Myself i know that what define "good sound quality experience" for sure ask for rightfully designed gear to begin with for sure but it is ESSENTIALLY acoustic and psycho acoustic speakers/room specific relation ... Nothing else.... Sorry for the measuring fads or for the costlier brand products obsession of some audiophiles... They are not even wrong, they are deluded by an half truth, out of acoustic experience and experiments...
«It is not the tissu nor the way it is woven so much as the way you dress a specific body»-- Groucho Marx learning craft 🤓 |
