Old records.


I’ve been literally keeping my somewhat recently bought turntable (and accessories) on the shelf and not using it after spending a lot on it (for me.) ( You can take a look on my profile)
After comparing it to my digital side for quite a while I decided the SQ was not nearly as good. So, I put the cover on it and let it lay dormant.
Now I have a collection of about 3000 LPs, mostly from the 70’s and 80’s. And, sad to say, most of them just don’t sound that good. However I’ve recently been playing some newer records, and the sound is wonderful. I know this not supposed to be the case. So, it’s possible all my old records have been somewhat damaged with old or faulty styli. Anyhow I now have a new lease on life with my analog side.

128x128rvpiano

You've got it RV. It use to be somewhat predictable. Classic good to great, pop not so much. Commercial pressings of modern music still have much to be desired. There are new smaller companies that are doing an excellent job of making quiet pressings. They usually specialize in re-releases.

If you are a picky person and can not stand the occasional pop and tic vinyl may not be for you.  

@lewm " I have found that every upgrade to my phono stage, TT, tonearm, or cartridge has resulted in better sound on average from even average LPs"

+1

 

 

Perfect Vinyl Forever is a vendor i used before i acquired an ultrasonic machine. i suggest you send them a sampling of discs. prices reasonable as is turn around time. Keep the CJ ;-) 

One final observation. The inequity between vinyl and digital seems to be more noticeable in classical records. In popular. Jazz, folk, rock, etc. the SQ is at least as sharp as digital. It’s with classical that I notice a less detailed presentation.

OP: The volume you use for playback can affect the perceived detail. Classical music has a wider dynamic range than Pop/Rock. Try increasing your normal volume and see if this helps. Example: Reference Recordings digital (wide dynamic range) must be turned up compared to regular CDs.