Qobuz and Tidal comparison


https://youtu.be/c3SGLAnweOk

 

They are doing serious demonstration.

The conclusion is that Qobuz give more realistic bass and nuanced details than Tidal.

It is because that Tidal use more compression.
 

128x128shkong78

When I compared Qobuz sounded better. Additionally Qobuz has over half a million high rez albums and Tidal has a small fraction.

I started with Tidal and after a year of urging by my audio guy, I started a free month with Qobuz… I cancelled my Tidal subscription within days.

I'm a new and happy Qobuz user. It took a couple of weeks to get the cabling right on my streamer but it's a very good source. I'm listening to Hans Zimmer-Blade Runner right now and it's blowing me out of the room with the volume just at a very low to moderate level.

I have both, and I’ve spent numerous hours comparing the two. In my experience/system, one doesn’t sound superior to the other across the board. Some tracks sound better via Tidal, and some tracks sound better via Qobuz. I find the differences in sound quality between Tidal and Qobuz to be negligible at best, so I use Tidal as my Roon default. Happy listening.

I have both Tidal and Qobuz running on my Aurender N200 and Vault 2i in sys 2.   They both sound excellent but I have to give the edge to Qobuz.   Tidal has some great live recordings which is why I keep it.   

In my experience it depends on the streamer. With Lumin U1 Mini as Roon end point Tidal sounded better to me. With Bricasti M3 inbuilt network card used as Roon end point I also found Tidal more to my liking. 
With Aurender N200 I prefer Qobuz. I use Tidal now to stream music that does not exist on Qobuz.