Vinyl Frontend/Linn LP12 Question


Hi Everyone:

I am contemplating an upgrade of my vinyl frontend and could use some advice--particularly from users of Linn system analogue. I'm currently running a VPI Scout/JMW-9/Dynavector 20XM through a ARC SP-16. In approaching a new setup, I want to think systemically--putting together a vinyl playback system where table/arm/cartridge AND phono preamp work synergistically. My goal is to improve vinyl playback across the board--particularly dynamics, detail and soundstaging. (I've recently added an Esoteric X-03Se to my system and my digital front end now vastly outperforms my vinyl playback).

I've got a few tables in mind, including the DPS, Rega, Kuzmi and the Linn Sondek. Here is one scenario: Go with an LP12/Lingo/Linto (arm and cartridge to be from Linn but not sure which yet). I'd replace the SP-16 with an LS-26 and run the front end combo through the latter. Some questions:

How does a modern LP 12 (Cirkus/Keel/Trampoline/Lingo) compare with some of the top vinyl playback out there right now? I used to own an LP12/Akito/K-9 many years ago and liked it but grew weary of the setup requirements and moved on. Does a fully upgraded LP12 compare favorable with some of the better systems out there or is it an antiquated system that has been refined but falls far short of "state of the art"?

Which of the available upgrades are worth considering? Which are really mandatory?

How many LP12 users also run the Linn phonostage (Linto)? Is this the best way to go or would I be better off with, say, a PH-5 from ARC?

Thanks for the advice and assistance. The rest of the system is an ARC 150.2, Daedalus DA-1.1 Speakers and Empirical Design cables.
128x128dodgealum
Tobias has a great point. I was a long time LP12 listener and upgrader. I really did like the table but hated dealing with it every time I wanted to change something. I Finally purchased an Avid Volvere which is not only a better performer but also easy to setup on your own. This is especially true if you use an SME tonearm.
No easy answers here. Tobias's point is well-taken and only you can answer the maintenance question. I have no problem with it myself. My setup is an LP 12/Cirkus driven by a Naim Armageddon power supply, with a Naim Aro arm housing a Dynavector XX 2 Mk. 2. Right now, I'm using a Dynavector P-75 Mk. 2 phono pre (fabulous for the money and great synergy with a Dynavector cartridge), but will be upgrading to the new Naim Superline. No Trampolin. If you can wall mount or have a dedicated stand on a totally solid floor, the LP 12 is quicker and more dynamic without it. People argue until the cows come home about power supply, phono pre, and cartridge choices for the LP 12 and I haven't heard a wide enough sampling to offer anything but my own choices. But as far as tonearm choice is concerned, I have heard a number on LP12s and strongly recommend the Aro. It totally plays to the Linn table's strengths. Good listening!
Just my $.02 worth but since you are looking for "particularly dynamics, detail and soundstaging." I would give Acoustic Signature a look. I have been using their Samba TT w/ a rewired Rega 300 arm and am very satisified. When the time comes their Final Tool is the way I am leaning, but a used Challenger is in your price range. Put any arm/cart combo that you like and you have a maintenance free setup.
Great dynamics comes with weight and non-suspended designs.

I second Tobias choice of TTs - with a preference for the Galibier/Teres/Scheu/Redpoint/Acoustic Signature range.

Arm/cart/phono has to be considered as a whole. Arm/cart for resonant freq and cart/phono for sufficient gain. Here your budget will play a major role.
The reason I chose the Avid was for its ability to have the bass weight and dynamics of a non-suspended design but the depth and dimension of a suspended design (which it is).