2. speakers
  3. 1120530937

Front- vs. Down-Firing Subs and Amp Issue

A couple of assertions in the audio world have me perplexed as to how to select a subwoofer for my two-channel system.

Richard Hardesty makes the blanket statement in his Audio Perfectionist Journal that down-firing subs should never be used for high-end two-channel audio. Only front-firing subs are suitable for this application. I see, however, that some of the most-recommended subs on a'gon (Hsu TN series, ACI and REL come to mind) are down-firing (or up-firing in the case of Hsu.) Maybe the answer is that audiophile subs can't be purchased at the price point most mortals can afford, and the lower-priced subs just happen to be down-firing? Oh, Hardesty also says ported subs are not suitable for high-end audio; must go with a sealed box. Interesting.

The second assertion comes from Mike Barnes at nOrh, who says on his website that the plate amps used in 90% of subs today is crap and puts out only a fraction of power that is claimed. The sound that was rattling his windows and creating "earth-shaking bass" was not bass at all- it was distortion. He also states that he began tests in subwoofer development using the popular Peerless 12" woofer, which was literally shredded by a (non-plate) 150-watt amp.

So now I'm confused. Is it possible to buy a high-quality sub for relatively little money? I can't bring myself to spend $3-5k on a pair of speakers only to turn around and spend nearly that much on a sub. Oh, and then I hear that if I want the best possible configuration I need two subs at twice the price, making my subs more expensive than my speakers. Is this just a fact of life that I'll have to come to grips with if I don't want to buy speakers that go down to 20hz?

Thoughts?
aggielaw
lej1447
117 posts
 
I have a Hsu VTF2MK sub, 10" down firing w/ rear dual ports. According the to the manual, if I want to play loud, dual ports need to be opened. If I want deep bass, one port needs to be plugged up.
Back to the point, I guess that seal sub can achieve lower frequency than vented ports, given the driver size, the amplifier, the box dimension, and all else are the same. However, there are many variables in real life. This is only my 2c thought, and my HT setup is a 5.2.
gmood1
1,251 posts
 
Unless you listen too pipe organ music. A sub that reaches into the mid 20 hz region would satisfy most. As someone has stated earlier..the room does play a factor in extention. I use dual stereo 12 inch subs and have measured flat to 30 hz easily in my room at 70 to 75 dB. Meaning I still get down to 20 hz minus maybe a few dB without touching the volume knob.

I would imagine, most instrumental recordings don't get much lower than 35 to 40 hz on average. The woofers excursion plays a roll as well in frequency extention.The Adire XBL and Shiva drivers are some of the best around. Acoustic Vision subs. I'm willing to bet any one of these units will meet or exceed any boutique brand out there in overall performance. It's up to you if you want to pay the boutique prices. Look closely and you will notice the same parts used between these two companies.Just different finishes and cabinet thickness. Adire Rava II.
onhwy61's avatar
onhwy61
5,155 posts
 
If the sealed cabinet design doesn't guarantee better performance, than why make the blanket statement that it's so important?
c5150
115 posts
 
LOL.....1001 reasons hi-fi is great
tgrisham
1,291 posts
 
Back to the original point....it is personal preference. Money doesn't guarantee performance. Listen to as many subs as possible, in your own room if possible. My opinion is this: I have enjoyed my 2 channel more with a sealed REL and my movies and DVD concerts more with a vented VTF-3R Mark 2 Hsu sub. Good luck!
More to discover