Thanks, Redkiwi.
For the last 3 or 4 years, I've been quite a stickler for proper line conditioning and have owned what I consider the best line conditioners available in the Foundation Research units. However, the vast improvements of the latest versions have forced me to become even more dogmatic about their rightful place in a system. So much so that I'm convinced the weak link in music reproduction is probably a lack of proper line conditioning on the engineering side.
Now I do differ from your statement about a component mfg'er doing all they can to address line conditioning and/or vibration control.
To me that would be a bad thing. I believe I stated earlier in this thread that the best thing a mfg'er could do regarding these two ingredients is stay neutral.
That's because there are multiple methodologies to select from and multiple ways to execute. If a mfg'er chooses an inferior methodology, then that product becomes not worthless but worth less to me.
And just because a mfg'er knows how to build an amp or a cd player does not mean they inherently know the first thing about proper line conditioning or vibration control.
I'm certainly not saying I'm an expert in these areas, but I do know that there are different methodologies and they most always clash rather than compliment. And I'd hate to have others make those decisions for me.
BTW, would you be too upset if I changed the name of my company from Dynamic Contrasts to Redkiwi? It would be strictly for martketing purposes. :)
-John
For the last 3 or 4 years, I've been quite a stickler for proper line conditioning and have owned what I consider the best line conditioners available in the Foundation Research units. However, the vast improvements of the latest versions have forced me to become even more dogmatic about their rightful place in a system. So much so that I'm convinced the weak link in music reproduction is probably a lack of proper line conditioning on the engineering side.
Now I do differ from your statement about a component mfg'er doing all they can to address line conditioning and/or vibration control.
To me that would be a bad thing. I believe I stated earlier in this thread that the best thing a mfg'er could do regarding these two ingredients is stay neutral.
That's because there are multiple methodologies to select from and multiple ways to execute. If a mfg'er chooses an inferior methodology, then that product becomes not worthless but worth less to me.
And just because a mfg'er knows how to build an amp or a cd player does not mean they inherently know the first thing about proper line conditioning or vibration control.
I'm certainly not saying I'm an expert in these areas, but I do know that there are different methodologies and they most always clash rather than compliment. And I'd hate to have others make those decisions for me.
BTW, would you be too upset if I changed the name of my company from Dynamic Contrasts to Redkiwi? It would be strictly for martketing purposes. :)
-John