A few years ago I used the D110 with an external HSU high pass filter. If you want to use a high pass filter you will not need the E110. The D110 is an outstanding sub!
Subwoofers and Crossovers.
My system is Cary DMS-550 / Luxman L-507uxii / Spendor D7.2
After researching I decided to add an active crossover and two stereo subs to the system.
- I am looking at JL Audio CR-1 as the crossover. This will take the pre-out from the Luxman and feed mains-in and setup the Luxman as separates. Is there anything else that I should look at? I am only looking at analog solutions.
- After looking a REL, Rythmic, SVS, Martin Logan and JL, I am leaning towards getting two JL Dominion D110s. Would these subs be sufficient or should I be getting JL E110s? I won’t be using the internal crossovers, so primary concern is fidelity.
- If I am unable to treat the room properly, I may be introducing a DSP solution just for the subwoofers.
I am looking for some advice from people who have walked this path before me on both the active crossover and the quality of D110s.
I would appreciate any advice on this process of integrating subwoofers into a two channel audio system.
@james633 , Thank you, I will search the forum. I will probably use low cost high pass filter and then replace it with the JL CR-1 later. |
If you are looking at DSP solutions, many of them also have digital crossovers for subs and then the extra channels of DAC that that requires. So going that way, you could avoid the considerable cost of the CR-1. Examples are the Anthem STR Preamp, miniDSP SHD, and DSpeaker X4. I'm using the Anthem to drive 4 subs now, with very nice results. I have no doubt the JL is excellent (a friend who could buy anything uses it). A lot depends on whether you want to maintain an all-analog path or not. So I'm not recommending any specific gear, just that you consider your objectives and what kind of signal path would let you get there within your budget and with the kind of sound you enjoy. Luxman and Spendor make a nice system! |
@yogiboy I am sure, just adding the D110s will help, but one of the main reason I looking to this is to unload the bass frequencies from the mains. @mike_in_nc , I really like the sound of Cary DMS-550 and the Luxman L-507uxii and am unwilling to insert a digital processor after the Luxman pre. Don't get me wrong, if I were to setup a new system from scratch, I will definitely get a Pre/DSP and a power amp. I will probably introduce a DSP just for the subs though. |
I am curious as to why you want to install a more complicated system which lengthens the signal path with a separate crossover unitand extra IC's IOW why not use the internal crossover in the Rel (or whatever sub you choose? Not meant to be snarky or insulting. I just do not understand your decision. |
@artemus_5 theres no highpass on most subs |
@artemus_5 , I did think of getting two E110s instead of two D110s + CR-1. The E110 options is much cheaper. I might be completely wrong in this, but I preferred the second option thinking that the crossover in CR-1 will be much better and I didn't want to run long line level connection to and from the subs. Thanks for nudging me to rethink that option. |
sorry to put a damper on your plans but i have the spendor d7.2 and previously the d7. tried to integrate 3 different set of subs, ML, JL audio and REL. you are on the right track trying to high pass the main speakers, the spendor's deep bass goes down to 25 hz in my room and trying to integrate theresigned usual way never sounded right. the problem is that the spendors are so fast and dynamic, i always felt the subs were out of sync and holding the timing hostage. after optimizing the placement of the spendors for bass response (try an audio note style corner loading, not too close, maybe 2 feet) and much experimentation, as well as an amplifier with sufficient bass power and control (pass labs) i decided the system was perfect without subwoofers. the d7.2 are very special speakers, fast and dynamic with deep bass due to the long flared port. proceed with caution and see if they can't satisfy on their own. |
@avanti1960 While adding the subs did you high pass your mains or did you run them full range? I am actually very happy with my setup.. but as is the case in this hobby one always wonders if things can be improved. Hence I am looking at adding subs/crossovers. In my room(fairly large) the system starts to roll off below 50Hz and there is nothing left by around 30Hz. Maybe I should look at my speaker placement more critically.
|
I am using a JL CR-1 crossover along with 4- JL F-113 subs. I have my speakers about 8 feet out from the back wall. This allows some very open soundstage albeit at a loss of the low bass that usually comes with closer rear wall reinforcement. Adding the subs to crossover at about 55hz. brings back that low bass that is missing. It also frees up the main speakers to sound there best. ozzy |
@ozzy thanks for the information. Do you see the benefits of high-passing the mains at low volume too or just at high volume?
|
At first, I ran the main speaker's full frequency and used the subs to fill in just the very low bass. After getting the CR-1, I found that removing the bass overlap not only sounded better but also reduced the need for the main amp (tube) to produce the lowest frequency. I was initially afraid that the added circuitry may color the transparency. Too my surprise the CR-1 seems to be pretty transparent and only proved to provide benefit. ozzy |
@ozzy Thanks for the feedback. |
The JL dominions I had the Svs 3000sb is much better , and has a very good tunable app, and you can download the free REW sub app ,but it’s cool to donate to it. Just buy a $100 usb Mike and learn the program to setup your own room , even better i bought the Svs 4000sb they are a. Smaller Svs ultra 16 great subs |
@fittebd , Thanks, in fact I have been leaning towards getting Rhythmic F12SE instead of JLs along with the CR-1. I may have to add a DSP just for the subs.
@audioman58 Thanks, it is tempting to look at SVS or ML for DSP, but I am still leaning towards Rhythmic F12s |
I have owned the Rythmic12 before the JL audio , the Svs gives you free shipping to try it for 45 days ,will even give you 45 days to check it out ,if not happy ,they give you a refund as well as free return shipping , very good tech support ,and a 5 year warranty ,they put their $$ where there mouth is ,the others Donot ! And if you look in their over stock dept even cheaper and 5 % off on top of it if you buy 2 . If you can afford the Svs 4000sb they wipe the floor with all others in the $1600 price range , even the smaller 3000sb which was very good and tons of best of awards , the 3000sb weighs 50+ lbs the 4000sb 102 lbs and only a few inches bigger but driver alone is 44 lbs could not be happier. |
I owned the predecessor to the 4000SB, not even close to musically as good as the Servo technology in a Rythymic. Its also listed on SVS for 1899 right now. Never owned a JL, have heard wonderful things about them. They compare closer to a REL. SVS way too boomy for me. It could hit the notes, and had the spl, but just a much different sound. But if big boom is what you want, yes the price is right, go for it. Everyone has diff. taste. For music you cannot be old fashion servo. If you had an older Velodyn before they ruined themselves, Rythmik servo is for you. The 12 for me was too small. I was thinking 2 15" ones but you run into cancelation and its hard to dsp with that. So I got the dual 15 version which avoids that. Add the CR-1 (this is really the must have for subs and music) and Roon DSP paired with my Sopra 2 the sound is so seemless. Even the bass heavy Billie Eilish tracks sound smooth and not bloated. |
I agree with Yogi.... try running the speakers full range with the subs low pass set low, around 60 to start . Often times it sounds better.... A crossover that let's you experiment with the high pass is also advantageous. 80Hz is too high and the main speaker looses some "meat on the bones" Too high of a low pass and the sub becomes directional. You can hear where it is in the room. I use a Velodyne sms 1 for sub eq and to roll off the sub sharp at 50 hz. You hardly hear it because my main speakers are full range but it integrates well. The JL crossover will let you do that.... |
The Spendor D7.2 are different animals with respect to subwoofer integration. Their quasi transmission line bottom firing port extends bass to 25Hz. When attempting to add 3 sets of subs to them without high pass filtering the main speakers, the sound was horrible at worst- cancellations, hard sounding bass, lack of seamless integration, affected the sound overall in a bad way. Adding in a high pass filter and you lose that quick, tight quality that these speakers have. No subs for me and the Spendor D7.2 and I am more than fine with that. |
@khiak Those Funk Audio subs look awesome and am sure they perform well, but they are not for me. Not only are they beyond my budget but they are also really big. @asvjerry If only it was so simple. I realize digital crossovers are really good, but I am reluctant to pass the analog output of my DAC through an ADA process. I am starting to think I am being irrational here. |
@dimbhaka, *L* It all seems irrational after a certain point imho, but....*shrug* ;) I like to set the 'general environment' to flat response as much as practical, given that I'm running diy omnis' and dipoles in a 'highly compromised' space with one DSP equalizer, and tweak to taste with another. "Compromise" as an artform....*L* You might give it a go as an experiment with a minimum outlay. I'm using the Behringer to pass the lower bass to a sub to keep the omnis' into the range they seem 'comfy' with, since lower bass freq. are 'omni' in nature anyway.... Works for me....if not for you, you can always curse me with whatever seems appropo.....*L* I've already got the 'underwear into the crease' version, so try something different and surprise me... ;) |
I use a MiniDSP SHD as an active crossover for my passive 18 inch subs. I also use the included DIRAC room correction that performs DSP on both the subs and the mains. bought the SHD from George at Deer Creek Audio and also gladly paid him to set it up and modify the program when I make system changes. It's all done remotely using a laptop and Team Viewer software. I never wanted to run my entire signal through a $1300 box, but I don't hear the SHD in the circuit except for the nice effects of the room correction and the seamless sub/mains integration. It's not the solution I would have expected I would buy, but it works extremely well. The SHD also allows you to time correct for the subs being set on a different plane than the mains. The MiniDSP SHD has a huge feature set for the money. |
Post removed |
@wokeuptobose Thanks for posting your experience with miniDSP SHD. If it is doing a great job in your expensive system, I should give up my paranoia about adding a DSP after my DAC. Just to clarify you are feeding the analog signal after Lampizator DAC to miniDSP to do ADC/DAC. I will look into miniDSP SHD. |
Yes, kind of. The Lampi's analog output goes to my preamp, the preamp output goes to the SHD. The SDH converts the analog back to digital, performs Dirac room correction and performs the crossover high and low pass, then converts the digital back to analog and sends the analog output to the sub amps and also to the mains amp. What amazes me is that all that is pretty invisible as to a sound signature. For a year I didn't even try the full signal going through the SHD. I fed one output from the preamp to the mains amp and the second preamp output to the SHD to feed the subs. It's a very versatile box. You can even run it as a preamp and/or DAC and/or streamer as it includes a Volumino licence. The DAC is good but does not stand up to the Pacific or the Vivaldi, but it comes too close for comfort. I say again, I was skeptical and didn't want to believe a $1300 component could perform like it does. |
@wokeuptobose Thanks for the clarification. I will be sending the Luxman's pre-out to SHD and feed the SHD's outputs to Subs and Luxman for the mains. I will be getting a miniDSP SHD.
|
@curiousjim thanks for suggesting SVS. As I am planning on adding miniDSP SHD, which has crossover and Dirac Live, I am looking at sub that have minimal processing. |
@dimbhaka , Great idea and almost the right approach. Get two E110's. Skip that crossover. In order to integrate subs correctly they need to be matched to the main speakers in time and phase. This can only be done digitally. A MiniDSP crossover will be far more effective and sound better than the JL Audio. There are other more expensive digital options if you care to move up the ladder. |
@mijostyn Thanks for the encouraging words. Also what products are similar to miniDSP up the price ladder? not too high though. |
@dimbhaka , From the MiniDSP you get into Digital Preamps like the Anthem STR and the soon to be released DEQX Pre4 and Pre8. The Trinnov Amethyst is another unit that I was considering but the Bass management is not flexible enough for my use. I plan on getting a Pre8 when it is released which is supposed to be within a couple of months. I looks to be the most advanced digital preamp on the market and is ore reasonably priced than the Trinnov. The Anthem is the best value. These units provide comprehensive subwoofer management including room control. They have digital EQ so you can tune your system exactly the way you like it and equalize each individual speaker so both channels have exactly the same frequency response. This is how you get to the best imaging your system is capable of. The Pre8 has a full function 4 way digital crossover so you can tri amp with a subwoofer. But, if it is just a subwoofer crossover you need the MiniDSP will do fine. |