Tekton versus Klipsch

I only have three things to add:

A. I asked a Facebook forum to compare the O/93 to the Perfect Set. I never got an answer but got accosted. Zero interest in being part of that "community" of charming open minded intellectuals. The arrogance around some brands is truly bizarre. 
2. I'm making arrangements to hear the CW's. My curiosity was piqued when some members that I've know and traded with began embracing this particular speaker. I wish it wasn't such a monster but at least they have a classic look that I can put a plant on or something like we did 20 years ago.
and D. Can dsper compare the CW to the GE? I'd imagine the CW to be more lively and textured but with less low end and smoothness? How am I doing? 

Good luck on your journey- always fun to get out and listen.

@larryi are you referring to the CW IV or earlier versions?

I've heard the current as well as a much earlier version.  I liked both.  The settings were different, so it is hard to make a comparison.

I am not a bass freak so it does not bother me that the Cornwalls do not do ultra deep and tight bass (I tend to like bass that is not has tight as is the case with most modern speakers).

Additional discussion here: https://forum.audiogon.com/discussions/high-efficiency-loudspeakers

I’ve heard a lot of Klipsch and could live with many models. Have almost pulled the trigger on many occasions. Also classy looks...not for everyone but nice!

Limited exposure to Tekton, but not likely to buy. Not crazy about big boxes with lots of drivers.

Big boxes also are a hindrance for me with Klipsch. I’d prefer to downsize. Very efficient Class D amps have helped keep me clear of larger speakers these days in that it is easier to get more out of smaller boxes. But.....

I’ve liked the small Goldenear Aon monitors when heard but have not yet taken to the Triton line in limited exposure.   Possibly bad setups.