Enjoy the music!
What is your audio axiom?
So we all have been given audio advice and also shared with others our tips and advice. I ask you to share your #1 audio axiom. If you were giving advice or sharing experience (say to a young person starting in this hobby) what would it be?
Here is mine (to start). “No matter how good your audio equipment or system, the quality of any given recording will make or break the listening experience”
Now the ball is handed to you guys…
Be an audio rebel; learn what you can in the process, but part of that is also to unlearn some of what you have and (keep) being open minded and maintain (or develop) a perspective in this endeavor. Audiophilia as an industry, business and marketing approach is one thing - we shouldn't be married to it and play willingly along like lap dogs, but rather find our own path. And while being on good terms with dealers can be beneficial it's most important, from my chair, to let your findings guide you along the way - wherever it leads you. |
Post removed |
Be an audio rebel; learn what you can in the process, but part of that is also to unlearn some of what you have and (keep) being open minded and maintain (or develop) a perspective in this endeavor. Audiophilia as an industry, business and marketing approach is one thing - we shouldn't be married to it and play willingly along like lap dogs, but rather find our own path. And while being on good terms with dealers can be beneficial it's most important, from my chair, to let your findings guide you along the way - wherever it leads you. |
@hilde45 +1 ... and the midrange. |
Find a seasoned, nearby Mentor, if at all possible, or an audio club. Our hobby attracts helpful, open-hearted people...willing to share their time and knowledge with others. Many of us have compiled cables and audio accessories to share or sell at bargain prices knowing we are advancing our hobby. We have reached an amazingly accessible time for solid audio with todays chip dacs and-op amps. YouTube reviewers like Randy (cheapaudioman,) Ron (New Record Day) and Jay's Iagi (for entry level hi end) provide wonderful information for beginners. With over 50 passionate years "in the chase," I'd be happy to help whoever wants to reach out. More Peace Pin (bold print for old eyes)
|
Good sound/audio quality used to be a priority in peoples lives. It still is for a very select few (who are still alive), but the vast majority of people could not care less about it. Bad is good enough and worse is fine too. The junk culture decimated this hobby over the past 40 years and the number of people who are discerning about anything, let alone audio, dwindles with each passing day. I still love it even though my friends and family think I'm out of my mind. |
@mylogic + 1 - Indeed, I enjoyed music no less when I was a teenager listening to it on a transistor radio. A new Beatles song was every bit as thrilling on that. It's a different experience today, but enjoyment of songs is the same. |
When I built my first pair of speakers, I was at the JBL profession dealer. I was purchasing upgrade components going from Two way, to three way speakers. The manager was with a guy dressed in a suit and they approached me in conversation. The suit asked me why I don't buy better speakers than building them myself? I told him, "You have never heard my system, or speakers I built." Being a young, proud collage man I was proud of what I made, and had heard many systems costing much more than mine, but was 10x more invested to sound better. So my response back to the man in the suit was " I bet my JBL 14" aquadag woofer, my LE 20 which I am upgrading sounds better than anything you have! His response. I am the JBL district manager, and I commend you on your great skills, your love for Hi Fi audio at its finest using our speaker components, and I bet they sound great with that LE 14 as the foundation. May I suggest the components best in your price range for the upgrade? And away we went. Wow! |
Appreciation of the performance, together with sound quality of system and recordings is not mutually exclusive. To presume music appreciation transcends sound quality of our systems and recordings is to diminish audiophiles and our pursuit of SQ.
The point of this pursuit is to enjoy and/or appreciate these three components of musical recordings when played on high end systems. If you can't have appreciation of all three things simultaneously you have issues with your system and/or perspective. I don't need perfect or even high quality recordings to appreciate both sound quality and musical performance. Flaws are ever present, the secret is to have a system and mindful perspective that allows one to accept these flaws without judgement. To ignore the qualities of sound both the recording and my system delivers would be a negation of everything I strive for as an audiophile. |
All valid responses and all are appreciated. No criticisms at all. I do agree with many here about music as the paramount issue or significant part of the listening experience. If someone likes “not ideal recordings” or enjoys music that is not necessarily high fidelity it is not something that bothers me all that much. The question I posed is more in line with the high fidelity or audiophile experience. Given two identical albums ( just an example) that were recorded well but one sounded better because my perception of the recording makes it sound more live, organic, true to the artist intent or desired listener experience. I would prefer that one. Of the recordings I listen to, the better sounding ones, are more appealing to ME. That’s why I proposed the thread topic because I thought it would be enlightening and informative to expand that question to other Audiogon audiophiles. BTW everyone here has different priorities with regard to listening to music. It’s a big world with different people and different ways of doing things. That’s a big part of this forum. Share, learn and grow. Of course listening to music is important to all of us. |
Which camp are you in….music or illusion? I know many music lovers who value lower quality recordings and rare bootleg records. Some collect rare events like concerts illegally obtained from primitive cassette recorders over perfect studio albums. Others have radio shows made on early mono reel to reel recorders that even the radio stations have erased. Music in the home is not made any more superior because of the gear it’s played through. If the source is a bad performance, it remains a bad performance. Real music lovers are not 100% obsessed or worried about the recording quality. If you can’t accept that then chuck away all your old archival recordings in low fidelity, and never even consider listening to the original greats. Sorry OP but in my opinion you have your priorities all wrong with recordings being paramount. The recording is not the defining point for a true music lover. The real question is are you a music lover or just out for a listening experience….. two different things and which ball you want to fetch. |
This idea of unique and/or individual recording quality variation is something that has really come into focus for me in recent years. I derive enjoyment from the nearly endless variation in recording qualities, by this I mean paying attention to the choices of producers/engineers in producing a work of art. We are not merely listening to musicians with these recordings, so many others involved to presenting these works of art.
My scale of judgement has far surpassed just good and/or bad, mostly I just turn off the judgement and let the presentation come to me, listening sessions far more satisfying when one turns off the judgement cap. Some believe the more resolving a system becomes the more the warts will reveal themselves, no doubt this true so then it becomes how one perceives those warts. |
There is one law, or best said a principle, guiding the wise audiophile life :
What matter is not the gear pieces price or his design, it is up to our budget limit to pick the right stuff for ourselves and our needs.
What matter is the way we installed together the mechanical,electrical and acoustical working dimensions of any chosen system/room...
As a consequence of this principle this is his corollary:
The mechanical electrical and acoustical controls,devices,tweaks, parameters, cannot be replaced by one another if we want to reach an optimal result in sound quality.
Vibrations/resonance controls cannot replace or be replaced by acoustics parameters controls or EMI shielding and grounding for example.
The greatest error we can do is buying and just "plug and play". Then upgrading a piece part by frustration or dissatisfaction, without learning how the whole system may,must,can behave in a specific room for our specific ears (psycho-acoustics).
The other error will be to cure one problem with a gear upgrade before trying to understand what is the problem.
This must be meditated by any beginners before "upgrading" and after "upgrading"...
There is no relation between a piece of gear or a system/room before and after his optimal mechanical,electrical and acoustical installation. None.
It is the reason why reviews do not tell all the truth there is to be tell ...
This resume what i have learned.
By the way recording quality variations dont matter if your system/room can present them as they are distinctly all different, on a continuous scale and not merely in two states : Bad and better.
|
I continually fool myself I'm done upgrading or changing things, don't know if a 'true' audiophile is ever done? Just purchased another SET amp to add to the collection, don't need it yet somehow I find myself the new owner of yet another audio component. The need to taste different flavors replaces absolute need. |
@ozzy62 - it would seem that way, yeah? But in my apartment I've got a long livingroom and I have my gear set up width-wise, not length-wise, so on one side I've got about 15 feet until the window wall, and on the other side about 10 feet from the opening that leads to the front door. So while there are technically walls, they are far enough away so as not to affect the sound. |
There is always a time and place for achieving our goals in life.We all start at the bottom of the ladder but as we progress and experience life, we will lean towards our passions and whatever makes us feel good.If music is your thing, I say listen to the music first and later if you have the means to experiment with different components, by all means go for it, life is short. |
@dweller Very sage advice but in many parts of the country thats a bit of a reach. Why wait to begin the journey toward the dream system? |
Patience, listen, research, learn. This is a long term pursuit that can be incredibly rewarding. However you have to be comfortable with ambiguity and learn to listen and hear. Each turn can be rewarding. Early days are the hardest until you get the basics down: not believing marketing hype, measurements, and in "Giant Killers". Sound quality comes in different flavors... highly detailed, punchy, natural and musical. The later is likely to be the most satisfying long term... but lots of folks like sound spectacular system. Figure out what you like... but realize it will change over time. Not one thing, and only a tiny sliver. |
@2psyop +1 My take … Recording technology and quality is the limiting factor to achieving a realistic reproduction of the performance or studio sound engineers intent. The system, while important, is secondary. My #2 … +1 @jji666 My take … Appreciation of the performance and composition is the primary goal. The system is only the means to achieve that goal. |